The 4 Pillars Of Literary Fiction

The 4 Pillars Of Literary Fiction


Are you writing literary fiction? Are you wondering what it is? In this post, we define it and discuss the four pillars of literary fiction.

We have written about:

  1. The 3 Pillars Of Horror
  2. The 4 Pillars Of Fantasy
  3. The 4 Pillars Of Romance
  4. The 5 Pillars Of Thrillers
  5. The 5 Pillars Of Family Sagas
  6. The 4 Pillars Of Science Fiction

In this post, we will be exploring the four pillars of literary fiction.

Literary Fiction is often touted as the gold standard for fiction. This is because, supposedly, it defies genre conventions and formulae. But if that’s true… how do you identify literary fiction?

I mean, we know something belongs to the Horror or Romance genres because they contain certain genre-specific tropes. Is your story about an ordinary protagonist in an isolated, disempowering setting with a dreadful past? Do they face a monstrous force? Cool— that’s a Horror story! See how handy that is?

So, how do you know which stories are Literary? What are its defining features? What are the pillars of literary fiction? I’ve spent almost a decade in academia reading, analysing, and dissecting exemplars of the Literary movement. In workshops, I’ve practiced implementing the techniques favoured by literary writers in my own work. Over that period of study, I’ve developed a theory of how to define Literary fiction I find satisfying.

I realised the source of confusion is that people use the term Literary Fiction to refer to a few different things, and to various combinations of those things. Many use it as a catch-all term to mean ‘superior quality fiction’. But this is a pretty hazy, subjective application of the term. So, you know what? We are going to set that definition aside and dig a little deeper.

The 4 Pillars Of Literary Fiction

Here are four different potential features of a work (which might be used alone or together) that folks could be referring to when identifying a work as Literary Fiction:

  1. Literary ‘Genre’ – Contemporary mimetic realism (don’t worry, we’ll break down and define these ten-dollar words later).
  2. Literary Style – Attention-grabbing, idiosyncratic prose.
  3. Literary Mode – Unconventional, unintuitive, or counterintuitive application of story elements and structures.
  4. Literary Attitude – A grave and/or ironic tone and approach to a story’s tone. The author may even apply this attitude to the composition process itself.

As I unpack each of these pillars of literary fiction, I’ll give examples of writers who use some mix of them to illustrate the genre.

1.) Literary ‘Genre’:

In almost every university writing workshop I’ve taken, the professor has required that workshop attendees write only literary realism. No genre allowed! This dictum confuses students new to writing workshops, so the professor has to define their terms.

Genre fiction, they say, includes any story with non-realistic elements and/or a story that contains any clearly-identifiable genre tropes. Some professors will even specify that stories with any erotic or violent content (or some mix of the two) are discouraged strongly. Unless of course, such erotic and/or violent elements are essential features of a thoughtful and realistic narrative.

So, Sci-fi, Fantasy, and Horror are out right away because they include fantastical elements. The only exception to this rule is if the story is a work of surrealism or magic realism. That is to say, if there are fantastical elements in a literary narrative, they must be grounded in the real, contemporary world. They must be a product of either altered states of mind (surrealism), the unexplainable circumstances of an inconsistent reality (magic realism), or an ambiguous blend of both.

Romance, Mysteries, Westerns, Thrillers, et. al. are also forbidden. Why? Because they have recognisable story structures and character archetypes that are familiar, and thus limit narrative exploration.

Well, you might say, what on earth is there left to write about?

Contemporary Mimetic Realism! (Hereafter referred to as ‘CMR’).

This means stories set in the present day and describing life as lived by every day, ordinary folks. Typically, works of CMR are drawn directly from the writer’s own experiences. A typical work of CMR might be about, say:

  1. A couple arguing after they have a miscarriage. OR
  2. One member of a newly-wed couple finding themselves jealous of the attention their new-born is getting from their partner. Perhaps they even become increasingly embittered toward their child.

In a nutshell, CMR stories are little domestic/family/work dramas. If there is a fantastical element, this must turn out to be a trick of the main character’s perception or, and reflective of their internal psychological states. Or it could be the unexplainable phenomena of an inconsistent reality, a la magic realism.

Let’s apply a surrealist and magic realist twist to the CMR story premise above:

Say the main character’s new-born appears to them (and no one else) to be rapidly growing beyond normal human size. Or, while the child’s unnatural growth is literally happening, there is no known, explainable mechanism and all the other characters treat this bizarre occurrence as something mundane. In either case, the child growing bigger (and thus, more important) in the couples’ lives would serve as a literalised metaphor for the main character’s perception of the child.

Example: Although Jane Austen’s works are popular Romances that virtually established the modern archetypes and structures of the Romantic Comedy, they are still considered literary because they are works of contemporary mimetic realism for their time.

2.) Literary Style:

Literary style is the use of experimental, self-conscious, attention-grabbing prose. Usually, this is applied both at the level of word choice and sentence structure.

Sentences might be spare and muscular or ornate and long-winded (or some mix of both styles). But, whatever else it is, a literary style will demand the reader’s attention remain focused at the sentence level–even at the narrative’s expense.

It’s that simple. But if you’d like a deeper dive, check out this somewhat cheeky article I wrote on the subject.

Example: Cormac McCarthy is often considered a literary author because of his bombastic writing style which oscillates between almost brutalist minimalism and unfettered maximalism. Yet his stories are often in the same tradition as early pulps and pop fiction. They are Westerns, Noirs, and Post-apocalyptic dystopian stories. 

3.) Literary Mode:

The literary mode upends conventional approaches to narrative elements and structures.

For instance, in the literary mode…

  1. Rather than start at the inciting incident and ending after the main dramatic question has been answered, the story will likely begin in the middle of things. This shows the author trusts the reader to piece together what’s happening. Then it will end at the climax. Again, this is because the author trusts the reader to determine the story’s ultimate outcome based on earlier textual evidence
  2. Rather than centring on a likable, relatable character, a story in the literary mode is more focused on introspective, in-depth character studies of painfully realistic, even loathsome characters.
  3. Rather than a single clearly-defined protagonist, there are many potential main characters.
  4. Most characters will be passive. The narrative happens TO them due to various coincidences, NOT because they take any decisive action toward a particular goal. If there is a decisive action taken, it happens at the climax. And we already know what that means… The character’s first decisive action (or first resolution to take decisive action) is the place where the story cuts off, leaving it up to the audience’s imagination whether the character succeeds.
  5. The narrative focuses on inner conflict. Protagonists rarely have a tangible, external goal, lest the narrative falls into trite conventions of genre fiction.
  6. Readers must infer whatever negligible plot there may be in a literary narrative. If the character has a desire, it often vague, intangible, and implied– never stated outright.
  7. Plot is not a central concern. The literary mode eschews traditional narrative structure to avoid predictability.
  8. Nonlinear narrative. Each section is probably a vignette rather than a scene. Often, such section have little (or no) a causal link connecting vignettes, adding up to something more like portraiture than a story.
  9. Literary fiction is slow-paced. It dawdles and meanders, lingering on the minutiae of everyday life.
  10. Characters remain in stasis. They learn nothing or fail to change by the story’s end. Rather, the reader must infer what lesson the character failed to learn that has kept them in the same mental/emotional/psychological rut. OR The character has a moment of disenchantment (loss of innocence) at the climax wherein they realise that they will never achieve their dream. This happens instead of an epiphany which would have implied a change for the better. OR Perhaps they achieve their dream only to be left disappointed and unsatisfied by it. In the darkest literary mode, the character realises they’ll never achieve their goal, but even if they did, they’d still be dissatisfied. So, they give up.

If you peel back its meta trappings and snip out its post-modern, hypertext digressions, Mark Danielewski’s House of Leaves is, at its heart, a good old-fashioned Haunted House story. But, it is labelled a work of literary horror because of its circuitous, unconventional patchwork structures.

4.) Literary Attitude:

By literary attitude, I mean the writer’s approach to their story’s tone. This is a tone influenced by either the hopeless naivete of modernism or the cynical irony of postmodernism. The story has a dark, open ending, ambiguous and unhappy, leaving most questions the narrative raised unanswered. The story may even propose a radical ideology meant to overturn the status quo.

You’d be hard-pressed to find a work of literary fiction with a hopeful tone and/or attitude toward its characters and subject.

Putting It All Together:

Let’s finish up by looking at an example of an author whose work feature all four of the pillars of literary fiction above.

Who is it?

Yup—you guessed it: Hemingway.

I’m sure you saw this one coming a mile away.

  1. Contemporary Mimetic Realism? Check. Not a hint of the Fantastic or Genre tropes.
  2. An idiosyncratic, attention-grabbing writing style? Name one writer whose style has been parodied more for its idiosyncrasies.
  3. Unconventional character archetypes and plot structures? Check and check. Hemingway’s characters are infamously unlikable and his plots so meandering they’re virtually non-existent. With one exception being perhaps his Nobel prize-winner, The Old Man in the Sea.

I have to be honest, I will always love The Sun Also Rises, but I challenge you to find a book with a more hopeless, self-serious tone.

The Final Word:

I hope these pillars of literary fiction help clarify some of the mysteries surrounding Literary Fiction. In particular, I hope it dispels the notion that the literary moniker signifies superior quality fiction while Genre, Popular, and Speculative Fiction are pulp. As you can see, there are quite a few different criteria that might earn a work the designation of being called literary. And, in fact, many works in the above genres incorporate various degrees of literariness.

In the end, the term ‘Literary’ is to literature what the terms ‘Avant-garde’ is to film; you can apply an Avant-garde or Literary approach to a story in any genre or medium.

Yes, Literary works might win more prestigious prizes; still, some of the most enduring and worthy works in the canon of great literature meet none of these literary criteria.

For instance: Arthur Conan-Doyle’s Sherlock stories are simply written, subtly fantastical, conventionally plotted, and light in tone. The same is true of J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series. Still, although definitely not literary by any standard, the adventures of Holmes and Watson as well as Harry and company, are some of the most iconic, beloved, and enduring stories to date.

Top Tip: Find out more about our workbooks and online courses in our shop.

 by Oliver Fox
Oliver earned his BFA from the University of Memphis (2015). After graduation, he worked as an editorial assistant for The Pinch (’16). Currently, he works as a manuscript analyst and is an MFA candidate at the University of New Orleans. He is the author of The Fantasy Workbook.

More Posts From Oliver

  1. The 7 Principles Of Strong Dialogue
  2. 4 Novel-Writing Resolutions To Keep
  3. The Holiday Nostalgia-Bomb Plot Generator
  4. How To Use Emily Dickinson’s 4 Super Simple Writing Techniques
  5. 7 Essential Techniques For Better Pacing In Your Story
  6. Janet Burroway’s 3 Principles Of Effective Narrative Setting
  7. Writers Talk 1: Neil Gaiman
  8. Hard Or Soft Worldbuilding: Which Is Right For You?
  9. 7 Tips To Write Like Neil Gaiman
  10. Janet Burroway’s 4 Aspects Of Narrative Time

Top Tip: Find out more about our workbooks and online courses in our shop.

This article has 4 comments

  1. Raine Chandler

    Oh my goodness. Thank you. I have been researching and reading and wondering about this for so long.

    I’ve come across the elements individually, but I’ve also seen things that definitely fall into a definite genre (e.g. Jane Eyre and the works of Jane Austen) defined as ‘Literary Fiction”. So I have been rather confused.

    This article really clears things up.

    Thanks.

    • Oliver Fox

      Hi, Raine—

      I’m so glad I could help shed some light on the rather confusing concept of lit-fic! It’s an elusive beast, for sure.

      Best,

      Oliver

  2. Indu

    how would you distinguish literary fiction from contemporary mainstream fiction or upmarket fiction?

    • Oliver Fox

      Hi there, Indu—

      I’m honestly not a fan of any of these categories because—unlike traditional categories—they don’t tell readers anything substantive about a given book. Worse, all three have been hazily defined since their inception. In all the time I’ve spent studying writing and literature, I’ve heard the latter two categories mentioned no mare than once each. That said, here is my woefully oversimplified guide:

      “Literary fiction”

      – (often) realistic, contemporary characters and setting

      -rarely any discernible plot

      – heavy focus on idiosyncratic prose

      – Characters are often unlikable

      Example- Raymond Carver’s Stories

      “Upmarket fiction”

      – clearly discernible genre (thriller, romance, etc.)

      – strong plot and pacing

      – highly idiosyncratic prose

      – May or may not include imaginative elements (the supernatural, fantastical, or science fictional)

      Example: Gone Girl, Lincoln in the Bardo

      “Contemporary Mainstream fiction”

      – realistic story about normal people going about their daily lives in our contemporary era

      -strong plot and pacing

      -prose is purely functional

      Example- Anything by Nick Hornby

Comments are now closed.